Home Quadrennial Defense Reviews - Background & Debates 2006 2001 1997 Official - Strategy, Posture, and Commission Documents Unofficial - Commissions & Task Forces Preventive War- Pros & Cons Militarized Globalism and Empire - Advocates, Skeptics, and Critics Strategic Aspects of Force Planning Strategy Issues & Assessments Debates & Commentary Resource Sites What's New Feature Archive Site Search PDA Sponsored Sites: |
Become a Friend of PDA on Facebook | Tag This Page (del.icio.us)
Background and Formulation
Assessment and Debate The Quadrennial Defense Review 2006 Transformation to What and Against Whom? The United States Navy and the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review DOD Mulls Shift of Carrier to Pacific Address at the National Press Club ("The Long War") QDR Speeds Navy Programs
Key excerpts from the 18 January 2006 draft of the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (.html file) (printable .pdf file) QDR Boosts Special Forces: Draft Review Cuts No Major Programs U.S. May Arm Subs With Conventional Warheads for Quicker Strike QDR's Crucial Question Defense Transformation
and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review Big Programs Survive QDR: U.S. Services Eye Personnel Cuts To Save Weapons Pentagon sticks with 2-war plan The QDR Capability Mix: Problems, Analyses, Solutions Strategists Debate U.S. Military Policy The 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review: Strategy and Threats Pentagon Reaffirms Globocop Role The 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review: The View from the Pentagon Defense Transformation
and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review Principles for the Next Quadrennial Defense Review Weathering the QDR Quadrennial Defense Review: Future Reviews Can Benefit from Better Analysis and Changes in Timing and Scope Budgeting for Empire: Ambitions Outweigh Strategy The Quadrennial Defense Review: Transforming to Meet Tomorrow's Security Challenges 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review: Shifting Emphasis Did the Pentagon Get the
Quadrennial Defense Review Right? Marching Us Into Chaos? Introducing the QDR, a battle plan for the New American Century DOD's QDR and the 2007 Defense Budget: Headed in the Wrong Direction QDR 2006: Do The Forces Match the Missions? DOD Gives Little Reason to Believe The world as a battlefield The QDR and the Intelligence Puzzle 2007 National Defense Budget and the QDR: Old Wine, Bigger Bottle Fighting on all fronts The Long War Roundtable on the Quadrennial Defense Review What the QDR Should Say; The Quadrennial Defense Review Must Stimulate Long-Term Change Pentagon Plans for 'Long War' on Extremism Bulk the Army or Review the Policy: The Defense Dilemma Betraying Our Troops: Procuring More Useless Weapons Systems Rumsfeld Surrenders: The QDR Dashes his Dreams of Military Transformation QDR Does Little to Improve Affordability Of Long-term Defense Plans Pentagon Review Calls for More Joint Service Operations QDR Leaves Repubs, Dems Skeptical First Echoes of a Hollow Force? Air Force Choices Make Little Sense Did the Pentagon Get the
Quadrennial Defense Review Right? Is Rumsfeld Bored or Tired? His latest, sad plan to transform the military
Battle Damage From the QDR
Home | Resource Sites | Email the Editor War Report | RMA Debate Page The Project on Defense Alternatives |
||||