Earlier this year, at least. Kyiv Post, Ukrainian Special Forces and Syrian Rebels Decimate Russian Mercenaries in Syria. It may seem puzzling due to troop shortages along the front line in Ukraine, but the logic is similar to that framing UA’s Kursk incursion: The Syria operation could contribute to a significant distraction for Russian forces should the Syrian conflict re-ignite – which is has. More than that, action in Syria (and the Sahel) lends some credence to Kyiv’s insistence that it is fighting a global war for the West against Russia. In this story, cooperation with an Al Qaeda spinoff -Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – a US-designated terrorist organization, is discounted. Also see:
Ukrainska Pravda, Ukraine plans attacks on Russian forces in Syria – The Washington Post
The Hill, Ukraine is taking the fight to Russia in Africa, Syria


“Sourcing basic weaponry has been relatively easy for HTS: Syria has been awash with arms since 2011, when Turkey and Arab nations, with US support, flooded the country with weapons to help bolster the rebels in the civil war against the Iran-supported regime. But HTS’s homegrown manufacturing, particularly of drones and missiles, has enabled it to pose new threats to a regime that lacks significant anti-drone capabilities.” See article from Financial Times 
from
from
In-depth report from The International Crisis Group is
From
Three goals: 1. A political solution that empowers Sunni Islamist rebels. 2. A political solution that draws Syrian refugees out of Türkiye and back into Syria. 3. A new arrangement that undermines the position and role of Kurdish forces in Syria.
“The former al Qaeda affiliate now governs approximately two million people, half of whom are internally displaced Syrians. Over the past three years, HTS consolidated power within its territory and sought to convince the international community that it no longer merits its pariah status as a terrorist organization.” CSIS,
“The unexpected success of the operation has caught both analysts and Syrian government forces off guard… The implications are vast: the largely stagnant battle lines in Syria have shifted dramatically over the course of four days.”
From this Christian Science Monitor article with the damning title
Al Jazeera
from
BBC
The New Arab
The
Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, the Pentagon press secretary, said on Monday: “Let me be clear that the US is in no way involved in the operations you see playing out in and around Aleppo in northwestern Syria, which as you know are being led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a designated terrorist organization.” However, national security adviser Jake Sullivan told CNN on Sunday that “At the same time, of course, we don’t cry over the fact that the Assad government, backed by Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, are facing certain kinds of pressure.” CNN,
What truce? And to be clear: It’s Lebanon and Gaza that are being flattened.
They’re a rebranded mix of “former” Al Qaeda & Islamic State fighters. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) has been for years confined to the province of Idlib where it essentially governs. A ceasefire with Damascus was brokered by Russia and Turkey in 2020. Now they’re exploiting Russia’s focus on Ukraine and various Israeli and US attacks on Iran-allied groups some of whom have been mainstays of Syrian government rule. Notably, “HTS had shown little sign of attempting to reignite the Syrian conflict until this week.” Has there also been direct encouragement by outside actors? BBC,
The 


This won’t wash – not involving any substantial number. Also, keep in mind that leaks have indicated that ~150 NATO military and intelligence agents are already present. Contractors? Unknown. At any rate: It would take multiple tens-of-thousands operating in rear areas to make a discernible difference, by improving support and freeing-up Ukrainian troops to go forward. Would this provoke RU vs US-NATO war? It would certainly increase the probability. But Putin has other options: Target NATO personnel in Ukraine. Also, an invasion by NATO makes total Russian mobilization politically practicable. All this should be obvious to Macron and Starmer, suggesting that the leak is a desperate gambit, in the shadow of Trump’s ascent, to dampen Putin’s optimism and improve Ukraine’s bargaining position. Ukrainska Pravda,
It’s been tested at a range typical of intermediate-range missiles. “It is designed to carry a warhead weighing up to 1,200 kilograms, a payload equivalent to three Iskander missiles combined. The missile achieves speeds of Mach 5 or higher, making it extremely difficult to intercept with existing missile defence systems.” That is: A very big warhead that’s impossible for Ukraine to stop given current air defense systems. And it’s a system designed for a much more consequential east-west war. A message? EU Today,
“Antipersonnel land mines are banned by a treaty signed by more than 160 countries, but the U.S. and Russia aren’t signatories. Arms control and human rights groups say they cause disproportionately high civilian casualties, and some can endanger civilians years after a conflict ends.” USA Today,
“Russia has gained almost six times as much territory in 2024 as it did in 2023, and is advancing towards key Ukrainian logistical hubs in the eastern Donbas region… Meanwhile, Ukraine’s surprise incursion into Russia’s Kursk region is faltering. Russian troops have pushed Kyiv’s offensive backwards. BBC,
Also see: BBC,
“Beth Miller, political director at the US-based advocacy group Jewish Voice for Peace, called the US veto on Wednesday ‘pathetic’ and said the Biden administration’s legacy will be the genocide in Gaza.” Al Jazeera, 
The three relevant resolutions were defeated 18-79, 19-78, and 17-80. All of those voting in support were Democrats. (Republican Sens. Mike Braun and JD Vance, the vice-president-elect, did not vote.)
Biden administration “terror-bates” Sanders et al. A new low for the White House. 
“The report details the most prominent crimes committed over the past 12 months, thoroughly documented by Euro-Med field teams. It traces the clear elements of genocide perpetrated by the Israeli army, explores the legal frameworks defining the crime of genocide, and scrutinizes both the context and ongoing circumstances. The report also addresses the international judiciary’s response, and, significantly, the global community’s complicit role in allowing the genocide to continue.” 