Publications
Dissuading China and Fighting the ‘Long War’
by Carl Conetta, World Policy Journal, 01 July 2006. ➪ PDF
The 2006 US Defense Review advanced two new strategic vectors for the US armed forces – one targets a putative “global Islamic insurgency”; the other puts America on a collision course with China.
(A longer version of this article was published in November 2006 under the title The Near Enemy and the Far: The Long War, China, and the 2006 US Quadrennial Defense Review.)
Mechanized Tube Artillery as an Integral Element of Expeditionary Forces
A Few Thoughts on the Evolution of Infantry: Past, Present, Future
Subduing resistance and guarding the peace in modern interventions requires high-quality infantry, but it is erroneous to think the job could be done by elite SOF forces because there can never be enough of these. The vast majority of the all-volunteer armies in the industrial West face a problem when it comes to attracting sufficient personnel: relatively few recruits are good enough to receive the more demanding training needed — creating a dilemma that has rarely been addressed and one that certainly is yet to be solved by today’s armies.
Die Europäische Union: Stolpersteine auf dem Weg zur Integration (The European Union: Stumbling Blocks on the Road to Integration)
Lambert Guard Unit Appears Headed to Israel
We Can See Clearly Now: The Limits of Foresight in the pre-World War II Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA)
Deadly Days Put Iraq on ‘Brink of Civil War’
The Pentagon’s Disconnect Between Planned Forces and Missions
America’s Long War: U.S. Introduces Radical New Strategy
Fighting On All Fronts
‘Something Has to Give’ in Pentagon Spending
Pressure mounts on Blair as British fatalities reach 100
QDR 2006: Do The Forces Match the Missions? DOD Gives Little Reason to Believe
Key excerpts from the 18 January 2006 draft of the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review
More troops for Iraq? Time to just say “No”
(printable PDF version) (HTML version) by Carl Conetta, PDA Briefing Memo #39, 09 January 2006. There is no reason to believe that a marginal increase in the US troop presence in Iraq will turn the tide there. The memo reviews relevant data on troop strength, insurgent activity, and Iraqi public opinion. It traces America’s troubles in Iraq to the nature of the mission, which it concludes is founded on strategic error.
Security in the Great Transition
“This narrative is written with the voice of a grateful historian in 2084. Whatever reality emerges [over the coming decades] will not be constructed out of human imagination and agency alone. Much is beyond our control. But as humans we have some freedom to apply our labor and skills with spirit and purpose toward goals. The first step on this path of purpose is in the imagination.”
Much Ado About QDR: Quadrennial Defense Review Triggers Great Anxiety, Little Change
Iraqi Civilian Deaths Mount — and Count
Masque of Democracy: Iraqi Election System Still Disfavors Sunni Arabs, Favors Kurds
Arms Control in an Age of Strategic and Military Revolution
400 Days and Out: A Strategy for Solving the Iraq Impasse
Vicious Circle: The Dynamics of Occupation and Resistance in Iraq, Part One. Patterns of Popular Discontent
Should We Stay or Should We Go? The US Debate on Exiting Iraq
(HTML version) by Carl Conetta. PDA Briefing Memo #33, 07 March 2005.
What do Iraqis want? Iraqi attitudes on the occupation, US withdrawal, Iraqi governments, and quality of life