cknight
Bush’s New Plan for Iraq – Military Experts: Doubt Over Increase, Even by Some Backers
A Troop Surge Can’t Win a Victory from a Bad Decision for War
(HTML version) by Carl Conetta, PDA Commentary in Common Dreams, 10 January 2007.
Tough Assignment: New Top U.S. General in Iraq Praised by Some as Both Nation-Builder and Warrior
Mapping the Alternatives to the Neocon-Neoliberal Diarchy in US Security Policy
… A leadership roundtable sponsored by the Security Policy Working Group (SPWG), organized by the Project on Defense Alternatives
Background Readings, December 2006.
-> HTML
Mapping the Alternatives to the Neocon-Neoliberal Diarchy in US Security Policy
(HTML version) A leadership roundtable sponsored by the Security Policy Working Group (SPWG), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 14 December 2006.
Operation Enduring Freedom: A Retrospective
Iraq Troop Levels Come Into Question
Outside View: How Bush Strategy Failed
War & Consequences: Global Terrorism has Increased Since 9/11 Attacks
(HTML version) (printable PDF version) by Carl Conetta, PDA Briefing Memo #38, 25 September 2006. The memo analyzes the change in the incidence of terrorism since 11 September 2001, finding a distinct increase. It also summarizes the findings of various studies on the relationship between the Iraq war and terrorism which show that in the words of one, the Iraq war “has reinforced the determination of terrorists who were already committed to attacking the West and motivated others who were not.”
Report of the task force on a Unified Security Budget for the United States, FY2007
Our Indefensible National Security Budget
Losing Hearts and Minds: World Public Opinion and post-9/11 US Security Policy
(HTML version) (printable PDF version) by Carl Conetta, PDA Briefing Memo #37, 14 September 2006. Reviews the change in global public opinion regarding US security policy since 9/11. It finds that opinion has turned strongly against US leadership, to the benefit of Russia, China and radical Islam.
Fighting on Borrowed Time: The Effect on US Military Readiness of America’s post-9/11 Wars
Pyrrhus on the Potomac: How America’s post-9/11 wars have undermined US national security
Kind’s Stance on War in Iraq Inspires DeNure’s Campaign
Dissuading China and Fighting the ‘Long War’
by Carl Conetta, World Policy Journal, 01 July 2006. ➪ PDF
The 2006 US Defense Review advanced two new strategic vectors for the US armed forces – one targets a putative “global Islamic insurgency”; the other puts America on a collision course with China.
(A longer version of this article was published in November 2006 under the title The Near Enemy and the Far: The Long War, China, and the 2006 US Quadrennial Defense Review.)
Mechanized Tube Artillery as an Integral Element of Expeditionary Forces
A Few Thoughts on the Evolution of Infantry: Past, Present, Future
Subduing resistance and guarding the peace in modern interventions requires high-quality infantry, but it is erroneous to think the job could be done by elite SOF forces because there can never be enough of these. The vast majority of the all-volunteer armies in the industrial West face a problem when it comes to attracting sufficient personnel: relatively few recruits are good enough to receive the more demanding training needed — creating a dilemma that has rarely been addressed and one that certainly is yet to be solved by today’s armies.
Die Europäische Union: Stolpersteine auf dem Weg zur Integration (The European Union: Stumbling Blocks on the Road to Integration)
Lambert Guard Unit Appears Headed to Israel
Deadly Days Put Iraq on ‘Brink of Civil War’
The Pentagon’s Disconnect Between Planned Forces and Missions
America’s Long War: U.S. Introduces Radical New Strategy
Fighting On All Fronts
‘Something Has to Give’ in Pentagon Spending
Pressure mounts on Blair as British fatalities reach 100
Key excerpts from the 18 January 2006 draft of the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review
More troops for Iraq? Time to just say “No”
(printable PDF version) (HTML version) by Carl Conetta, PDA Briefing Memo #39, 09 January 2006. There is no reason to believe that a marginal increase in the US troop presence in Iraq will turn the tide there. The memo reviews relevant data on troop strength, insurgent activity, and Iraqi public opinion. It traces America’s troubles in Iraq to the nature of the mission, which it concludes is founded on strategic error.
Security in the Great Transition
“This narrative is written with the voice of a grateful historian in 2084. Whatever reality emerges [over the coming decades] will not be constructed out of human imagination and agency alone. Much is beyond our control. But as humans we have some freedom to apply our labor and skills with spirit and purpose toward goals. The first step on this path of purpose is in the imagination.”